McLachlan Park's camphor laurel trees may get a reprieve as Clarence Valley Council waits for a new plan.
McLachlan Park's camphor laurel trees may get a reprieve as Clarence Valley Council waits for a new plan. Debrah Novak

Community not happy with approval to remove trees

CR Andrew Baker has put forward a simplified plan for the redevelopment of McLachlan Park in Maclean. But the plan can be even less costly and more rational.

READ STORY: Council votes unanimously on McLachlan Park upgrade

The community never asked for bells and whistles, but we have repeatedly asked for the retention of the park's greatest assets, the heritage trees.

A petition signed by 1500 people protesting this proposed act of vandalism was presented to Council and apparently ignored. Why?

Cr Simmons is correct. This is a contentious issue. And we're all sick of it. But you don't decide to act just to be seen to be finally doing something if it is against the wishes of the public.

An artist’s impression in October, 2015 of how the revamped McLachlan Park could look. Clarence Valley Council has voted simplified McLachlan Park development guidelines that doesn't include some of the 'fancy' improvements such as boardwalks and sandstone walls.
An artist’s impression in October, 2015 of how the revamped McLachlan Park could look. Clarence Valley Council has voted simplified McLachlan Park development guidelines that doesn't include some of the 'fancy' improvements such as boardwalks and sandstone walls.

The community is not happy about the fact that the removal of the four century-old camphor laurel trees is still on the agenda. Why is Cr Baker so hell-bent on destroying these iconic trees? He may say that he is finally implementing an out-of-date, unreviewed Plan of Management for the park. If it is so urgent that these 'weeds' be cut down, why hasn't it already been done in the 13 years since it was drawn up?

I don't believe that Cr Baker or any of the other councillors are agitating for all the other equally noxious camphor laurels in the valley to be felled.

The huge cost of removal, and the expense of buying mature replacement trees doesn't seem to be a factor either. Why not? Isn't CVC scrabbling for money on all fronts - selling our assets and increasing our rates?

A petition signed by 1500 people protesting this proposed act of vandalism was presented to Council and apparently ignored. Why? Was it because some of the signatories were tourists? Aren't our tourists very important to our economy? At least 90% of people surveyed wanted the trees saved.

GOT THE CHOP: Ballina Shire Council has cut down trees in Crane St.
GOT THE CHOP: Ballina Shire Council has cut down trees in Crane St.

Cr Simmons is incorrect when he says that one tree has to be removed to construct an exit lane from the so-called SPAR car park. You could put in a wider-than-required lane without doing more to the trees than trimming a branch. Two arborists' reports have concluded that all the trees are healthy enough to be retained.

Our council knows the value of tree retention and is actively planting trees in many areas. We thank you for the many trees planted recently along the high side of River/Cameron Street - from the High School to the solar shop.

But please save the most important trees in Maclean - our camphor laurels that add great beauty to the entrance to our town.



Universal Medicine under the spotlight

Universal Medicine under the spotlight

Northern Rivers group responds to news of investigation

More than double the duck at Grafton Show

More than double the duck at Grafton Show

100 ducks make it into the Grafton Show

FORTRESS FIGHT: Rebels amped for Goliath battle

FORTRESS FIGHT: Rebels amped for Goliath battle

REBELS formulate a plot to dethrone Group 2 front runners.

Local Partners