WATERCOOLER: Is this the best way to save $5 billion a year?

THE Federal Government could save more than $5 billion a year if it made changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, a new report says.

 The Grattan Institute report, Hot property: negative gearing and capital gains tax reform, shows that the interaction of a fifty per cent capital gains tax discount with negative gearing distorts investment decisions, makes housing markets more volatile and reduces home ownership.

The two measures in combination allow investors to reduce and defer personal income tax, at an annual cost of $11.7 billion to the public purse.

Other taxes, which often drag more on the economy than a capital gains tax does, must be higher as a result.

And like most tax concessions, these tax breaks largely benefit the wealthy, the institute report says.

The report recommends that the capital gains tax discount should be reduced from 50 to 25 per cent, and that negatively geared investors should no longer be allowed to deduct losses on their investments from labour income.

A smaller discount would save about $3.7 billion a year, while the change to negative gearing would raise $2 billion a year in the short term, falling to $1.6 billionas losses start to be written off against positive investment income.

RELATED: Malcolm Turnbull says report on negative gearing is wrong

The reforms would provide relief to the Budget in tough times and slightly improve housing affordability with little impact on how much people save, says Grattan CEO and report co-author John Daley.

'We estimate property prices would be up to two per cent lower under these reforms than they would be otherwise,' Mr Daley says.

DO YOU THINK THERE SHOULD BE CHANGES TO NEGATIVE GEARING? 

JOIN OUR WATER COOLER CONVERSATION FOR TODAY BY LEAVING YOUR COMMENT BELOW

The report comes after Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull ruled out any changes to negative gearing, a move welcomed by the real estate industry.

Mr Turnbull claimed Labor's plan to make changes would hit mum and dad investors and see a huge impact on property prices, the biggest asset for most Australians.

But the Grattan Institute report says that is nonsense.

Should there be changes to negative gearing?

This poll ended on 11 May 2016.

Current Results

Yes. It only benefits richer people

62%

No. It allows ordinary people to invest

23%

Yes. But only gradually

10%

No. It will hurt home prices

4%

This is not a scientific poll. The results reflect only the opinions of those who chose to participate.

'Contrary to urban myth, rents won't change much, nor will housing markets collapse. The effects on property prices would be small compared to factors such as interest rates and the supply of land.'

The report recommends phasing in the reforms, to make them easier to sell and to prevent a rush of investors selling property before the changes come into force.

While other proposals, such as restricting negative gearing to new properties or limiting the dollar value of deductions, would improve the current regime, they nevertheless leave too many problems in place and introduce unnecessary distortions.

'These two sensible reforms won't hurt private savings much but will save the government a lot of money,' Mr Daley says.

You can read more on the report here



More asbestos found on beach

More asbestos found on beach

Council to manage contamination situation

Blogger's lawyer defends 'Rolf Harris' comment

premium_icon Blogger's lawyer defends 'Rolf Harris' comment

'She's not saying Serge Benhayon behaved like Rolf Harris' jury told

Million-dollar opportunity for Grafton greyhound

premium_icon Million-dollar opportunity for Grafton greyhound

Bokarm Dean in running for Ladbrokes Million Dollar Chase

Local Partners